|
| About the Congress | Congress Registration | Online Discussion | Discussion Papers | Conference Calls | Contact Us |
We are very pleased with this proposal from Shambhala
International and we thank all of the organizers for including advance
consultation with all of the centers. This initiative coincides with a strongly
felt need in our group to further consolidate our own community, and at the
same time to be able to respond more to the needs of the larger society.
While it is true that the Shambhala teachings stand on their
own the energy of the community is also necessary so that they truly have a
home. The different sanghas in different places are the dwelling-places of
these teachings and each has it’s own particular characteristics. As you are
suggesting, this great range of experience within the sangha provide an invaluable
source of knowledge that we can all benefit from sharing.
Therefore, it seems that within the structure of the
congress it would be useful to organize meetings between centres that are
living similar processes. (This could be defined according to the number of
members, size of their host cities, the kind of culture they belong to- for
example areas that still practice indigenous traditions, - etc.) This would
allow these centers to work together on common issues. Perhaps these
discussions could fit under the category of
“self-organized workshops” and we would need to figure out what the
descriptive categories would be.
TOPICS FOR
DISCUSSION
HOW WE SEE OURSELVES WITHIN THE MANDALA
Mexico is a country with it’s own profound and ancient
spiritual tradition Over the centuries
it has incorporated and been enriched by the different spiritual expressions
that have arrived here.
The Shambhala teachings have come to us thanks to Chogyam Ttungpa’s personal interest in having this happen. Due to his instructions in 1986 the first meditation group started here, several Shambhala levels were held and a larger group was consolidated. From 1993 to 1995 there was more attention given to intensive training in the Buddhist tradition. This year a group of approximately 35 people finished Heart of Warriorship and began the Sacred Path Program. We are planning to finish those 6 levels by the beginning of 2004. At the same time we have worked more deeply with the Buddhist teachings through weekly study groups, nynthuns, and Buddhist programs, retreats, and weekthuns taught by Acharya Allyn Lyon. The core group is consists of about 50 people, and in open programs we have had up to 80 people. We have just recently begun a Nalanda Arts program, which we hope to expand in the next years.
At this time our greatest challenge is to find and buy land
for a retreat center where we could recieve large groups and offer programs for
people from other countries.
KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITIES THAT WE CAN
SHARE WITH THE SANGHA
A sense of hospitality, warmth and joy. An
important cultural characteristic of México is the capacity to create heart
connection and participate fully in different communities and groups. For the
last three years we have had vigils and community get-togethers around a fire
pit in our center that we built for this purpose. These are warm, joyful
gatherings that include music, dancing, food, storytelling and the opportunity
to simply enjoy each other. In this loving, warmhearted atmosphere, we have
encountered a deeper understanding of what it means to be a community where the
dharma is not only spoken or taught, but lives and breathes within and among us.
We believe this means being a community that values openness of heart above all
else
We have discovered that this goal involves several aspects…
Cultivating an attitude and atmosphere of openness to and
enjoyment of learning, which can be directly experienced and transmitted to
others. Our goal is to enjoy learning
so much that this becomes contagious to others.
Coordinating the
different administrative areas in pairs rather than individually. This has
to do both with cultivating enjoyment of learning from others and with breaking
our habitual patterns of being very comfortable with what we already know how
to do. This habit tends to isolate people from each other.
The pairs look likes this: There is one person who feels
they know how to coordinate a certain area along with another who feels that
they don’t know and want to learn about that area. The one who “knows” learns how to share what they “know” and sees the other as the student within
him. The one who is “learning” sees the other as the teacher within him. Each
is a mirror for the other, reflecting both their blind spots and hidden
capacities.
Cultivating a sense of humor towards our own and other’s
mistakes. We have discovered that this is extremely important at all
levels of our organization. On the one
hand the coordinators know they have to learn and grow as they carry out their
responsibilities, and in order to do this they must not only make mistakes, but
also benefit and learn from them. At the same time, each time someone offers to
take on a task or responsibility that is new for them others have the job of
trusting and supporting them knowing they will do their best, and their best
will include mistakes, because, again, they are learning. Regardless of the
material outcome of the person’s efforts we feel it is essential to recognize
the gift which each person is offering when they take on a responsibility
and consider that their mistakes come
from their heart and can be met with open and compassionate heart. When we can
keep our sense of humor alive and remember that our goal is always to be open
to learning we can actually celebrate when a mistake is made. In this way we
support each other, and help ourselves and each other to continuously open up
to new learning.
When there is
conflict look for what is missing When conflict arises, instead of blaming
someone or something we are learning to look for what is missing; the piece we
need in order for things to function better. When we discover what it is we
need this is also a cause for celebration because it brings us greater clarity.
Barriers to
learning Staying with what we already know because it is comfortable for
us.
Needing to hide what we don’t know and closing ourselves off
to thee possibility of learning from others.
Being blind to what we don’t know. Not being able to ask for
help: considering that needing help is a sign of some kind of personal problem,
or thinking that one has to resolve all problems alone, or only being willing
to accept the kind of help that one has already decided is appropriate. Lack of
confidence in the support of the dralas and the lineage.
Within the coordinating council (eight people) we try to be
respectful and understanding of what is going on in the personal life and
professional of each member so that when there is a particularly demanding
moment for someone others can be supportive and alternative ways to cover that
person’s responsibilities can be found. It also means that many people are
participating in the organization of programs, and other aspects of the center
and therefore learning about how different areas function. (Of course this
provides us all with wonderful opportunities to make a lot of new mistakes all
the time!)
The coordinating council has the responsibility of keeping
the vision of the center on track and looking for what is missing in order to
keep the dharma expanding.
Introduction
The
Shambhala Meditation Center of Chicago sees our relationship to the wider
mandala, to Shambhala International, to our sister centers, to our wider
Chicago community, and to our Midwest community, as being one of reciprocity. We feel quite rich in what we receive from
the wider mandala and in what we are able to give to the wider mandala. Because of our recent successful experiences
with hosting the Sakyong’s visit to the Midwest, we are beginning to take our
seat consciously as a big city center, acknowledging—with some surprise—our
vibrancy.
What
follows is a description of how we see ourselves at this moment in time and
what we see ourselves as being able to contribute. We collected these ideas, thoughts, and aspirations at a
Community Gathering held on June 15 and from the work of the center’s Resource
Development Committee.
Financial Resources
Sharing with Shambhala
International
Our
Resource Development Committee will present the following proposal to our Executive
Council for sharing our financial resources with Shambhala International. We propose that we contribute 5 to 15
percent of our net program income, of our unrestricted donations, and of our
membership dues to Shambhala International.
We think that, in order to facilitate budgeting, Shambhala International
may want to charge each center a monthly amount, based on each center’s
previous year’s net income.
Sharing with Other Centers
Since we
are fortunate enough to be operating in the black, to have been able to
compensate Acharyas according to the guidelines recently proposed, and to own
our center, we feel we may have some experience that we could share with other
centers in this regard. We have a
policy of sharing our finances openly with the whole center community. We are at the beginning of a process of
developing a center-wide budget that will include all programs that we offer,
our regular practice times, our bookstore, and all social events. At this point we have developed a budget
that includes all of our Buddhist classes and programs.
Membership
We are
proposing that all center memberships be dual memberships in the local center
and in Shambhala International. Here in
Chicago, our Resource Development Committee is proposing to our Council, that
membership be opened up to allow people to come in more easily, possibly at the
level of $100 per year and that there be discounted memberships for students
and the elderly. All members would have
these membership benefits: our
quarterly newsletter, discounts on all programs, and discounts at our
bookstore. Our committee is further
proposing a more “committed” level of membership, where members would
contribute at least $60/month or execute a contract with the center for
contributing their time for a year at certain designated tasks. These members would receive a key to the
center, in addition to the other membership benefits.
Curriculum
We see
ourselves and other centers as a testing ground for programs and
curriculums. We have, and will continue
to, apply ourselves very diligently and intentionally to implementing the
Shambhala School of Buddhist studies courses.
For all courses not requiring an Acharya, we have a senior teacher, a
less senior teacher, a coordinator, and when possible, a Shambhala Guide
responsible for each course. This team
meets ahead of time to lay out how they will teach the curriculum and meets for
a feedback session after each class. We
have some experience in this regard that we could share with the wider mandala. (We did not participate in the conference
call to do this, but will submit responses to the questions asked.)
Role in the Midwest
As an
outgrowth of our role in hosting the Midwest Regional Office of Practice and
Study Conference and the Midwest visit of Rinpoche on his recent book tour, we
here in Chicago would like to take some role of coordination in the
Midwest. We enjoyed our role of host
and liked extending our hospitality to the other Midwest centers. We would like to initiate increased communication
among the centers here in the Midwest to explore how we can share resources,
ideas, teachers, and Acharyas, how we can better coordinate Shambhala Training
levels, Shambhala School of Buddhist Studies courses, or other programs. It also seems appropriate that we get
together to plan for the future of our Midwest Shambhala Retreat Center. Most of the centers of the Midwest are at
greater geographic distance from one another than the centers in the east or on
the west coast, so the way in which we work together will have to be shaped by
this factor. We would be willing to
initiate this effort by facilitating a meeting of the Midwest centers at the
Shambhala Congress.
One
final thought, it was very powerful and inspiring for us to gather as the Mid-western
sangha for the Community Talk given by Sakyong Mipham Rinpoche. It would be good for us to repeat this
annually or biannually for the visit of Rinpoche or some other major teacher.
Sister Centers
One of
our members had the idea of centers linking as sister centers for a year or
more. During this time the two centers
would share with one another how they operate, their successes and challenges,
their newsletters, etc. Delegations of
members could visit back and forth.
Perhaps, even teachers could be shared.
This could link a beginning center with a more established one, or could
link centers from different countries, or centers alike in their size and
location.
Creating Enlightened
Society
While we
have established the value and the precedent of organizing help for each other
when a community member is in need, we want to go further in supporting one
another. Some ideas put forth for doing
this are the following: to create a directory of expertise that community
members have, so that members could call upon other members when needing that
kind of expertise, helping both themselves and the livelihood of the member
performing the service, to re-activate the delek system, or to have each member
keep five community members in mind and check on them periodically. Here in Chicago, we will experiment with
different ways to stay connected with one another, in the spirit of the delek
system, but probably without that name and with new structures that fit our huge
urban area and busy lives. It would be
good to explore this as a topic at the Shambhala Congress.
Being in
the center of the most diverse part of an immense urban area carries with it
much opportunity, challenge, and responsibility. Our center is located on a main artery in the area of Chicago
called Rogers Park, the most diverse area of the city. To reach out to our community, beyond our
regular times of being open for meditation and meditation instruction, we plan
to offer monthly How to Meditate classes on Saturday mornings based on
Rinpoche’s book, with several Meditation Instructors and our Shambhala Guides
taking the lead. We also want to join
with some service already being offered in Rogers Park, such as a food
pantry. We are renewing our active
participation in the Midwest Buddhist Council and have a member that would like
to help us connect with the wider religious community in Rogers Park. Finally, we intend to catalog what our
members are already doing in the wider community. We are just at the beginning of engaging with our wider
community, but we have strong consensus that we want to do this. Again, this would be an area in which we
could learn from others at the Shambhala Congress.
Acharyas and Senior
Students
Recently, we have had a spate of key people leave
Chicago. Bill Brauer left to direct
Karmê Chöling, Ben Medrano left to be Kusung for Rinpoche, Mary Fugiel left to
go to Gampo Abbey for at least six months, someone else is retiring and moving
out of the Chicago area, and another member is moving to Karmê Chöling.
This,
combined with the fact that we have few senior students to begin with and that
one of the people who left was a senior student and a senior teacher, is
causing us some grief and consternation.
It has increased our longing to have an Acharya live in Chicago. We are able to
attract many teachers to our Center.
This fall and early winter we will have the honor of hosting Jim Scott,
Acharya John Rockwell, Khenpo Tsultrim Gyamtso Rinpoche, and Acharya Lief. We are moving toward an arrangement with
Acharya Lief—sharing her on a regular basis with the Atlanta and Washington DC
centers.
We are
also moving to bolster our Vajrayana energy at our Center by creating a
Vajrayana Shrineroom, having monthly Vajrayana practice days, having quarterly
Vajrayana practice weekends at the Midwest Shambhala Retreat Center (along with
Milwaukee), and making sure our Padmasambhava and Vajrayogini feasts take
place. We also have the goal of
increasing our Ngondro Meditation Instructors from three to five this
year. Having Acharya Rockwell teach a
Vajrayana weekend here in October should also inspire Vajrayana students.
The
upside of not having a lot of senior students at our Center, is that those of
us who came along after the Vidyadhara had passed are working with the senior
students we have, are stepping into appropriate leadership and teaching
positions, and are opening the doors for even newer students to come in, to
practice and learn, and to take on beginning leadership roles. This makes for good energy and for a feeling
that the Center belongs to all of us.
Conclusion
We look
forward to taking an active role in the continuing Shambhala Congress
process. We would be happy to send more
information on any of the points mentioned in this report or other areas.
(Thank you for the opportunity)
We would like every question that is posed at the congress to
have a section that inquires “What works and/or what doesn’t work at your
center in regard to this issue?”
AREAS OF CONCERN
·
How to deal with scholarships, and. work exchange in payment
for programs at local centers.
How to instill a sense
of wanting to contribute to programs with either money or labor; a sense that
some exchange needs to happen. Is it
always the case that some exchange needs to happen?
·
How to encourage regular financial support from individual
center members for their center and for Shambhala International. Should such support be packaged together
with a center sending a percentage of their dues on to SI?
·
What percentage of program income, as contrasted with dues,
should be sent to Shambhala International as a whole; what is the reason
Shambhala Training is the only department that now ask that centers to send a
percent of their program income to them.
·
What additional things can we, in the centers do, to
stabilize Kalapa Court and Shambhala International financially so there is a
sense of stability and well being that can radiate from the center of the
mandala.
·
What is the financial relationship between Kalapa Court,
Prvy Purse and Shambhala International?
Is there a way or ways to structure
community that enhances a local community’s ability to care for its members?
·
How to identify people
who need help as well as how to respond to them with appropriate resources.
How to Address Practical & Avocational Needs of
Community
Many of the people who come to our centers not only want to explore a
spiritual path, but they have personal
practical needs with which they need help, such as:
1.
How to work with dying friends;
2.
How to be a good parent;
3.
How to have intimate relationship
4.
How to initiate personal change in livelihood or relationships
5.
How to determine right livelihood
·
Since there is currently no central support for this type of programming
how can we be more forthcoming with this kind of help?
·
What guidelines would there be for community trade people, business
people, medical people, poets, crafts persons, artists and others who want to share
their expertise at local centers through presenting programs?
·
How can we identify and distribute information about professional
resources available through the sangha, locally, regionally, and globally?
Sunny greetings from Lexington!
First of all, please know that our center is 100% with the direction of
the movement being initiated from Halifax. We are so appreciative
of the open communication that is helping us all clarify our thinking
on how we are manifesting both internationally and locally. Creativity
is joyfully rising to the occassion ~
Our Council met this past Saturday to discuss the various issues
that are "on the table" at this time. Our local sangha
has been committed to addressing these changes for over a year now, and
we were heartened to discover through conference calls and email last
summer that other centers were going through the same process. Here
in Lexington, it seems we are in major "systems level changes",
to the next higher levels of organization, and that what we are all experiencing
may reflect a gobal shift of consciousness.
We have had several community meetings over the past year, (and will be
having at least one more before November), and have decided to organize
our structure based on Mandala principle. We have used the traditional
mandala form and juxtaposed the buddha families at the four directions,
with Buddha wisdom holding the space at the Center of the mandala. The
Sakyong is at the very center, and since the throne in any of our traditional
iconography is pictured as a square, we have a square in a circle, representing
Nirmanakaya Buddha, and buddha nature in all of us. The next closest
ring in signifies the local teaching group of MIs, and this is surrounded
by Council. The four gates represent ways people come into the community,
so we have Shambhala Training, Dharmamdhatu, Nalanda and a Community Gate,
for those individuals who only want to practice meditation at this time.
In between the cardinal points, are the functions, which relate to all
the gates, including Administration, Finance, Kasung, Outreach, Communication
& Media, Membership, Center Warrior, and Practice and Education.
One major value of organizing in this way is that we are remembering to
think of ourselves as a whole, and not separate parts.
And, as you might guess, the mandala is "complete, but never arranged"!
One of the ongoing issues which has plagued us for years revolves
around the question of membership. Finances are also a major concern.
We wonder if International is looking at new ways to generate revenues
along with dues and fundraisers? Given that we are also recognizing
angst within the local mandala because the policy of Shambhala Training
is tighter, we wonder if the tithing policy of ST might not be used on
a mandala-wide basis, or at least to begin working toward this?
We have a clear consensus that working together as a whole unit is the
way to proceed. Even though we recognize the value of separating
Nalanda as an educational foundation, and dharmadhatu as a religious organization,
has creative advantages relative to taxes and banking, in our actual thinking
and planning, our view is "taking whole".
We are also intending to address
issues related to length of terms for Council and Director(s), and consider
how these positions are filled. At this point, we are operating by consensus,
but recognize the limitations of this process of decision-making in large
groups. Is International recommending guidelines related to process
issues?
These are some of the issues we are addressing so it is a very busy time,
filled with lots of communication, lots of possibilities, and a manageable
portion of uncertainty. It is helping the trust grow within the
community to have these issues out on the table and being discussed in
open space, and the dialogue between center and fringe is delightfully
informative.
A number of us who attended Kalapa Assembly in 2000 really liked the Collaboration
Groups. We do want to note the frustration of many to having to
choose only one group to relate to for the entire time period. For
the Congress, perhaps there could be a variation on this theme by having
various discussion group topics set up with one facilitator. If
we plan to have movement between plenary sessions and smaller discussion
groups, we could remain together as a working group for the sake of building
the energy within a container of trust, and these groups could move from
topic to topic over a period of several days so that everyone would have
a chance to address each major topic area. Maybe at the close of
each day, the entire assembly could hear summaries from each of the "fixed
points", the facilitators. We can find ways to continue the
discussion beyond the Congress, and we can also find ways to make sure
we have action items with certain individuals "claiming" parts
of the work.
It has also been requested that we find ways to be in daily touch
with local sangha via email or conference calling so they can be more
actively involved in the proceedings. It would be helpful to designate
times and places for this to happen.
Another request, for future planning, is that the Congress be held
during the summer so our University faculty members would have the option
of participating.
In closing, we extend our deep
appreciation for the priviledge of participating in these history-making
changes in these precious moments of now. We look forward to continuing
the discussions. Thank you all at International ~
The following represents the comments and suggestions
garnered from the Minneapolis community in response to the
Shambhala Congress Vision:
To set the background for our
comments in this regard we interpreted the presentation of the Congress Vision
to center around two broad themes or objectives (hereafter referred to as the
themes of the congress or simply the themes) and multiple discussion topics
relating to specific ways in which those themes might be addressed, expanded
upon and carried out.
In addition to these goals of
vision we also singled out three goals of practice that we would like kept in
mind as the congress is planned.
That said our comments regarding
the discussion topics is as follows:
This
is a list of key issues, proposed by the Ottawa Shambhala Centre, for
consideration at the Shambhala Congress.
·
Identifying the core values of Shambhala.
·
Simplifying the organization and its operations in order to
focus on activities directly related to our core values.
·
Relating all our programs, such as Shambhala Art, to our
core values as a means of manifesting these values within the larger society.
·
Placing more emphasis on how the Shambhala Buddhist
teachings can be practically integrated into both our individual lives and into
building more humane communities.
·
Developing links with other community, social and spiritual
groups and organizations with similar values, and joining together with them to
develop initiatives to create a more peaceful and humane society.
·
Developing organized volunteer and charitable activities
aimed at benefitting those who are the most vulnerable members of society; such
activity would also increase the visibility of Shambhala in local communities.
·
Providing on-going support to community members,
particularly to those experiencing difficulties in their lives.
·
Exploring ways to reconcile the conflicting demands of our
personal and collective desire to "turn the flower outward," and the
competing time/energy stresses related to livelihoods and family.
·
Working towards the development of a more diverse community.
·
Developing our capacity to raise funds in an efficient,
transparent and effective manner.
WASHINGTON D.C. SHAMBHALA
CENTER
We at the Shambhala Center of Washington DC had an open
meeting to read the Treatise and discuss the Shambhala Congress.
We applaud the effort to host the Congress and felt the
issues identified were certainly the primary ones we are concerned with.
We are particularly concerned with the financial health of Shambhala
International and are exploring ways we at a local level can offer support
while balancing our financial needs.
We also had a few suggestions to add:
Thanks you for all your work
Education:
Our members would like more classes and study groups....we have limited
staffing ability... as one member put it "So I don't know if that
means more teaching materials and more teacher availability to take the load
off you and Paula, or what but I think that if we were offering a variety of
classes, we could advertise and attract more people"
Related to that are people from all over the state who want to study Shambhala
Buddhism, but don't live near a center. They might benefit from online
courses and workbooks that prepare them for onsite classes with senior teachers.
That same format could be used by intown students as well when there are a
shortage of skilled teachers.
Practice:
The same shortage of meditation instructors as teachers applies in our
area. It is difficult to provide the personal ongoing support for all new
people, and we have no one authorized at the ngondro or sadhaka level. I
personally am qualified to take the ngondro instructor course, but don't
have the time (or money) to travel to a far away center to do so. If this
could be provided online it would be very helpful as well. I
talked with Gils about this possibility at SMC, and he was interested. He
is going to talk to Reggie about working with the material he presents this
fall at SMC.
Volunteerism/Pay:
It has been almost a full time volunteer job for the last 4 years to get our
center up and going, to teach, and administrate and handle communications.
As we grow and reach more people, the teaching requests from around the state
are also increasing. I would like to look at a structure that allows
teachers (and administrators where possible) to get paid a reasonable fee from
the monies charged for the program that they teach.
Questions to consider:
Does the administration need to be centered in Halifax? Might it
not be better to have people spread out throughout the different regions of the
country (world) who communicate by phone and computer with occassional
meetings?
What are the criteria for the composition of the Board of Directors of
Shambhala International, and how does that affect decisions?
Can we develop a structure for the Shambhala Congress itself that will
facilitate decisions being made while we are there together? In other
words, if we can articulate the issues ahead of time, can we gather resource
people and decision makers together with the groups to discuss real costs and
real time lines to make some of our plans materialize?
·
Outreach
o
Important to reach out, diversify
o
Extension to broader ethnic base and groups such as those
with disabilities
o
Many places looking for "ecumenical" dharma - eg
universities
o
View that we need guidelines about when to use the Shambhala
imprimatur: how do we mix individual
social and political statements and lifestyles with Shambhala vision
·
Community
O
Extending our community into new forms and enterprises -
e.g. assisted housing, schools, hospitals, co-housing - also, adopting
"best practices" from the outside
O
Seniors/aging sangha—how to care for, medical, financial
etc.
o
Need more family programs and practice
O
Pre-teens and teenagers—need more programming content for
them
O
Volunteer vs. paid staff, spirit of volunteerism, etc.
O
Need some way to deal with internal conflict - conflict
resolution mechanism similar to Upaya Council
O
Role of central organization and how it relates to large
centers that are fairly self-sufficient versus small centers that rely on
greater support
O
Communications are key
·
Economic Models
O
How we relate to money is a mandala-wide issue
O
Desire to look at other models, e.g. Greyston, to see what
se can learn…also what we can learn from their internal processes
o
Satellite centers vs one main center? Would multiple small
centers help alleviate costs, as well as invite more people to participate?
o
Would lower prices make dharma available to more people? How
to do so? Look at other meditation centers to see how they do it.
o
Fundraise to allow more people to attend programs who can't
afford them
·
Information Technology
o
How to use IT to support and radiate the dharma
·
Practice & Study
O
Lack of clarity and depth around the two paths (SSBS and
ST)…. currently have to leave local center for more intensive studying,
teaching, and practice. Make
post-seminary and post-assembly curriculum available locally, not just at
retreat centers.
Shambhala Center Los Angeles held a community meeting on Sunday,
22 June 2003. Following a reading of the Sakyong's "Treatise on Society
and Organization," people broke into small discussion groups to provide
feedback for the Shambhala Congress.
Most items that came out of these discussions seemed to fall
into two general categories:
1) concern about the lack of a cohesive community and
feelings of isolation and
2) requests to define the "stem" or organization
(both local and S.I.) and how it functions.
Lack of
cohesive community
The greater Los Angeles area is geographically spread out
with not much sense of community. It is a "car culture" and doesn’t'
seem to have a core. This provides a unique challenge for the Shambhala Center
in that members of the center coming from different directions may live as much
as 50 miles apart. Location has been a difficult subject to work with in our
search for a new center.
Define the
"stem." What are the functions of the organization?
·
How are center director’s chosen?
Other
questions:
The
scribe for one of the SCLA discussion groups that met to give input for the
Congress just e-mailed me her carefully written notes. I am passing
them along intact to be added to my previously e-mailed questions
& concerns.
I
would like to note that, especially with the earlier list,
I felt a strong urge to edit since some items seemed (to me) more appropriate
for the congress than others. However, the people who participated in
these discussions put forth a great deal of effort and
I ultimately decided to send their input in a somewhat raw and unedited
format. I leave it to others to sift through the comments and
determine what may be of value.
Yours
in the Vision of Shambala Buddhism,
Marilyn
Moore
SCLA
Council Secretary and Acting Director
Addendum:
ROUGH
SUMMARY OF A GROUP DISCUSSION
The
session moved through a few themes. The first began with the Center in relation
to the whole of LA---the idea of expanding, of greater outreach, spreading
teachings. The outreach was not just to individuals, greater diversity,
but also to multi-religious groups. It was one person's sense that in
LA people were really seeking "community" more than in other urban
areas.
Another
thread brought in had to do with the quality of relationships---of treating
each person with respect; making room for everyone---"loosening our minds
around the edges." What is better for the group as a whole?
From
a reference to how hard it was to do the work of the center, a discussion of
celebration and community took place. Reference was made to the Regent's encouragement
to have a lot of parties and to Rinpoche's statement that without a
sense of celebration, why break out of the cocoon? How do you create that sense
of celebration and community? Experiences of visiting teachers, seminary, dathun,
Mid-Summer's Day were mentioned as times when a sense of celebration, community
and caring for each other was palpable. There was a question about the
importance of container for this to happen. Also the observation that
work was
a part of the experience. At a practical level, instilling a sense of celebration,
could affect how people perceived the work to be done for the Center's
programs, etc., give a greater sense of ease.
At the end, we began to talk about what was
meant by "community". Some phrases were:
congregation of individuals; to care for each other; to encourage and
protect; using the Buddhist sangha as a guide; commonality; community of vision.
Final
question: Can we take on more?
Guiding
Values of the Victoria Shambhala Community:
GROUND:
·
Meet with council and leaders of committees to understand
the tasks and boundaries.
·
Gather input and suggestions from groups: council, elders,
MI’s, guides, new members, and the whole community.
·
Write down task descriptions and lines of communication
·
Establish a comprehensible hierarchy
·
Communicate the resulting amalgamated and refined view to
the whole sangha.
·
Each committee and department will have a budget
·
Graduated financial decision-making and accountability
·
Regular summary financial reporting to the council from the
treasurer
·
Regularly communicate our financial situation to the sangha
·
Establish order and fluidity
·
Explore, cultivate and draw on the richness and diversity of
the community.
·
Poll and troll for strengths, talents and interests.
·
Incorporate our findings into action and inclusion.
PATH
·
Encourage volunteerism – Yes, first
·
Encourage delegation
·
Be receptive to and incorporate feedback
·
Engender a sense of belonging for elders, members and
visitors through communication and listening.
·
Encourage practice as the base of our community
·
Engender participation and communication
·
Create containers and boundaries
·
Move toward the obstacles with courage, unity and clarity
·
Encourage and support celebration
·
With the Pacific Northwest Region Shambhala centres
·
With Shambhala International
·
Invite visiting teachers
·
Communicate this to all members and to others as appropriate
FRUITION
A hospitable, inclusive, harmonious, vibrant and prosperous
Shambhala Centre for the Victoria community, which is well connected to the
larger mandala and is a brilliant manifestation of the Great Eastern Sun
vision.
Co-Directors’
workplan
1. Articulate values, priorities, and workplan
– By April 1, 2003
·
Seek approval, feedback and support from the Shambhala
Council
·
Communicate this to the community by July 2003 and elicit
feedback
2. Review
all roles and responsibilities - By end of summer
·
Establish “who is on first’
·
What they do
·
Where the boundaries of their roles are
·
What decision-making authority they have
·
Who they are including in their efforts
·
When and who will be ready to report to council on their
activities
3. Share the holistic structure and vision
with the entire community - mid –September
4. Plan
next steps and present to council – October, 2003 council meeting